The “I AM REAL” clothing collection is here. In an age where separating the real from the unreal has become a reality for most of us, and at a time where the proliferation of AI images and video saturates and seeps into our lives and overworked minds, we now have an opportunity to form a resistance. Do we allow our physical realities to be bent and shaped into the virtual, or do we fight back, and reclaim our lives, our sanity, placing physical existence and community on top of our agenda?
As part of this fightback, we at kalimetric have a proposition for you. We have products, yes. That we are trying to sell, yes. But wouldn’t it be great if this could be more than just a clothing launch? What if you could be a part of something?
That’s why we would like to say… why don’t you, the consumer, also contribute to this project? Design and order your own “I AM REAL” T-Shirts. Wear them outside, generate conversation, discuss your worries and hopes for the new world. Connect with people, build community. Remember, we used to do this before the virtual world took over our lives.
You don’t need to follow suit with architecture photos. You could capture resplendent nature. Or someone/some people you know in a special location. What’s important is that you include “I AM REAL” and the coordinates of the photo on the T-Shirt, so that people can find where the photo was taken, and what the campaign is about.
We are starting the “I AM REAL” process with our two architecture T-Shirts.
The first T-Shirt, “I AM REAL Urban Decay”, is a dilapidated, derelict, abandoned structure, which is likely soon to be demolished. The coordinates are included, but will it still be there when you go to visit it? THe physical world is transient, constantly renewing and rebuilding itself, but with photography, we take a snapshot of time itself. Perhaps these T-Shirts will be the only living remnant of this memory in 20 years time…
The second T-Shirt, “I AM REAL Brutalist”, is a photo of converging, brutalist bridges, and a leading path. A piece of graffiti brings the scene to life. The bridges were likely built out of necessity, but the construction has also built something to gaze upon. The unlikely human hand wielding the paint gives us a freeze frame capture that we can all experience in the physical world if we just go out and look. Explore your surroundings instead of social media, and you will be surprised what you find!
The “Entwined” print by Almos Lataan (https://almoslataan.com) arrived back from Printolino. It is 10×8 inch print, from a 5×4 Large Format Negative. It’s actually a recent edit. There was a print version of the photo used in an exhibition at The Glasgow Gallery of Photography which was was still a little dark, so some edits for print were made.
Printolino are great for the quality of the print. However, I used to use Loxley Colour, who also produce fantastic prints, and I would say that their packaging of the prints is a little better, with two extra stiff pieces of card on either side of the print, minimising the chances of damage in the post.
As to paper choice, Hahnemühle William Turner 308gsm was chosen.
The AlmosLataan project itself is meant to be a celebration of life.
Two souls are entwined in pregnancy, beginning a relationship of love, beauty, and pain, symbolised by the roses.
Initially part of a sister project (at https://almoslataan.com), I am showing on this site as I’m not really updating my other site at the moment, but I may do at a later point. I would define this particular piece as representative of a more serious approach to photography which I would like to explore, along the lines of celebrating life, in an age where life itself is being rejected in a very real sense. I hope that this photo helps capture the beauty of what is the incredible birth of a new person into this world, with all the wonder that accompanies welcoming them, and seeing them grow.
The quest for a quick to use, compact, quality film camera (on the cheap) has led me to the Voigtländer Vitomatic II, complete with the Colour Skopar 50/2.8.
The first point I would like to reference is the build quality. This camera is heavy, and has a wonderful heft to it. It seems to be completely made of metal, not something you see often these days. I also bought a Voigtländer Vito CLR at the same time (a present for a friend), but this arrived with a broken range finder, stiff focus, and a loose, and useless light meter. Perhaps this indicates that the CLRs are lower in quality, but it is only an example of one. The naughty Ricardo seller did not inform me of the broken viewfinder, even though it should have been obvious! Still, I bought two untested cameras on the cheap, and one turned out to be fine, so that’s not bad, although I’ll probably need to buy a different present for my friend!
So, back to the Vitomatic, and now it’s usability. Loading the film is reasonably simple. You need to lift and turn a latch on the bottom of the camera, which releases the whole back. Then it’s a case of sliding the film into a slit on the left barrel, then pulling the spool to the right to hook into the space provided. The slit barrel should have been pulled to the left, making the film tight, and with the film perforations sitting on the teeth. At this point it is safe to close.
Following this, you must set the film counter to F (for a spool of 36).
Then ensure your ASA is set to the right number (I had Kodak Golf 200, so I set to 200). To do this, you need to press down the semi-circled, toothed cog, and turn the ring until 200 comes into the ASA window.
After this, you just need to cock the shutter. This requires pulling back the clip on the back of the camera once or twice until it locks. Simple – now you are ready to shoot.
The next step is not so simple, but I hope that it will get easier with practice. This is the focussing step. The camera is a rangfinder, so this means there is a split image which you need to bring into alignment. When I first picked up the camera, I thought it didn’t work. I was peering through the viewfinder, and turning the front focus ring with no effect. Finally, I consulted the online manual, and saw that there should be a central yellow patch that I had to point at a vertical line when holding the camera horizontal, and point at a horizontal line if holding the camera vertically. I was finally able to see a dim ghost image when pointing the yellow dot at vertical lines. Rotating the focus, I could bring this ghost image into alignment with the object I was concentrating on. Voila! The focussing worked! What I would say is that it is hard sometimes to see the ghost image, particularly when it is within the object, such as a face. I think what I will do in future is try to guess the focus distance first, then alter the focus ring manually, then peer through the range finder, concentrate on the right vertical of an object, before turning to the right. This should reveal the ghost image, and I can then turn to the left again, sure if focus.
Of course, you still need to get the right combination of shutter speed and aperture. The camera has a clever way to do this.
First, you must align the light meter eye (a circle) over the light meter needle, so that the needle appears within the circle. You do this by rotating a ring on the lens. Easy peasy.
Second, you then select your aperture, shutter speed combo. By rotating the aperture ring on the previous step to align the light meter, you will now have a number of shutter speed aperture combos available to rotate onto by turning the shutter speed dial on the lens. It’s a clever system.
Then it’s a case of pressing down the shutter button. The click isn’t very satisfying, it’s quiet and barely registers. However, this is good for candid photography.
So that’s all the functions. Everything seems to be working on my camera, but I still need to put a whole roll through it. There are still a few things that could go wrong: an inaccurate light meter; slow shutter speed. But I hope that I get some good pictures back.
I will update with the results as soon as I can print some pictures. I don’t just post photos on the internet anymore, it needs to be in print form. This protects the image from algorithm and normal theft, and also encourages me to actually print the photos! Physical media trumps the virtual – it’s so much nicer to flick through an album than look at your Instagram, plus it helps to prevent ego bloat.
Well, whilst I am in the path of retracting from virtual tech, I have to say that manual tech I am still very much interested in, with the Zeiss Ikoflex II (851/16) being case in point.
Having initially bought an Olympus AZ-200 Super Zoom for my first foray into carryable film cameras ( I actually started at the deep end with an Large Format Sinar Norma 5×7), I soon lusted after larger again, as if this was something important. It hurt to think that I was taking pictures that could have been larger. Thus, I began medium format research. I knew from large format that handheld should be kind of possible with medium format, but my funds were limited. I eventually settled on TLRs, which combined portability with decent but fixed lenses. Rolleiflex are of course the kings here, but they were way out of my budget. However, a little bit of research led me on to the Zeiss Ikoflex. Now, these come in a variety of forms. I opted for the 1936/37 Ikoflex II. The reason for this is I wanted a pre war model as potentially the parts used may have been more durable. Whether this is the case, I am unsure, but it is still working well after a year and a half.
Appearances for this model are nothing short of spectacular, with a deco design that includes an aesthetically wonderful focus lever. It really is quite special to take out and about, and gain curious glances, if that is what you are after.
More importantly (hopefully), how does it use? Well, having not used any other TLR’s so far, it’s hard to make comparisons, but these are my feelings. Shutter and aperture dials work fine, as expected, with a max shutter speed of 500 (not had to use this yet). Aperture on the lens goes from 3.5 to 22, more than reasonable.
The lens is a Tessar. My impressions are from it that it is very nice, if you are after the look it gives, which I am. It is not the sharpest, but I’m really not after that. Colours render nice. However, please keep in mind that I am not a “technical” photographer. I prefer “feel” and “looks” to pixel peeping, which is one of the reasons I moved to film in the first place.
Now, onto the not so good. The focussing lever, which I love from an aesthetic point of view, would really be better served with a focussing dial for faster, more accurate focussing. Perhaps I still need to practice more, but I find focussing of close subjects hard.
Secondly, to fire the shutter, there is another lever, rather than a button. I find that this makes the shooting process a little more intense, and I don’t dare shoot anything lower than 1/60. So that means I’m almost always walking round with Portra 800.
Other issues? Well it’s manual wind. This means you can shoot double exposures if you want, and also means you accidentally shoot double exposures when you don’t want. Eek. Only happened once so far, but disappointing not the less. Also, the lack of an auto wind after each frame means that there is sometimes a little overlap between frames. Also annoying, but also one of those quirks that almost makes you smile, particularly if you hate how easy it is to attain a picture through digital.
Getting your film aligned is a little heart stopping on the first roll. You need to use the red circle underneath the camera, and wind till you reach the first frame. You need good light for this, as it is hard to see. I actually missed my first frame on my first roll, as I skipped past Portra’s 800’s one digit, which kind of looks just like a line. But this is less the cameras fault.
So with these attributes in mind, how has my shooting developed? Well, for landscapes, the camera is brilliant. The square format opens up a whole new way of looking at the world, and the results with the Tessar are dreamy. But people shots are a lot harder. Firstly, with no built in light meter, you need to use an exterior one. I’ve just been using the Android app, Lightmeter, which provides a close-ish match with the camera, even if the focal length is a little different. This immediately slows things down. Then I have to manually set aperture and shutter based on one of the pairs the light meter app gives me (meaning no mental arithmetic – I highly recommend this app). Then I have to use the dreaded focussing lever whilst looking through a mirror that is supposedly one of the brightest as far as TLRs go (I dread to think of using something dimmer). Finally, I cock the shutter, and then slowly pull down the shutter release lever. I can say I have some very nice people results, but I can also quite categorically state that this camera is not for the sport or candid shooter. Due to this, people shots have gradually made way for a lot more landscape shots, as the frustrations of keeping impatient people in place has taken its toll.
Finally, with regards to the camera itself, it is bulky, and slightly heavy, meaning that although portable, I don’t take it everywhere. There is also the element of fear. What if I lose my impeccably sourced little wonder? What should I take when I am just going round the corner? How many times do I still wish I had taken my camera? Well, it’s quite a lot, which tells me that I need to look smaller again.
Where does this leave me? Well, I feel I now need to support my Ikoflex II in some way, with something tiny, that won’t weigh much. Something I can really put in a pocket. That will be the next chapter.
Work. Nobody likes it. Sometimes we classify it as doing what we love, but for most people, work is doing what we don’t want to do. However, there is something deeper at stake here. Not only does work carry with it value – both to ourselves and others – the removal of it, sometimes through “technological innovation”, is often the path to both our manipulation and the fragmentation of society.
Firstly, lets be extremely clear. Working is still a formality in the lives of most. We need money; rentiers need labour. We hope that within this socio-economic relationship that people are being treated fairly. But what of our “free-time”; our “relax time”? It is here that a war of sorts is being waged. After a hard day’s work, should we not have available to us a time for relaxing? Certainly, rest is important. God himself rested and designated a whole day for us to do so too. Rest, and family and friends time. A period where we can strengthen our relationships with others, grow spiritually, slow life down. Except, that’s not happening, is it? Instead we are locked into screens and virtual communities, while our local communities flounder. We are becoming strangers to each other. Relationships are not being strengthened.
What has happened is that our relax time has been hijacked in a fashion. The issue is that even in our relax time, we should be working on our relationships, and perhaps working to improve ourselves spiritually through activities like book reading. This should in fact be pleasurable, and not like work at all. However, in the modern day, a plethora of distractions assail us, such as access to mindless, continuous social media reels. These other activities seem like less work, coming with plenty of small dopamine releases, which bring with them addictive behaviour. What is happening is a rewiring of our brains. We are being taught to seek the path of least resistance, taught to seek shallow goals, particularly through social media’s combination of bitesize information, and infinite content (think doom scrolling). This rewiring also has the effect of increasing perceived labour costs for other activities, such as socialising and reading, activities that in the past would have been viewed as pleasure, but are now deemed “work”. Yet, if we can avoid the social media bitesize dopamine addiction process, if we can leave it for good, we will find that reading a book, and strengthening a relationship becomes easier with practice. We need to exit from a process that is dumbing down our mental faculties, creating addiction to the irrelevant, and destroying our relationships. How can we begin to find God if we cannot even find each other?
So, certainly if you are reading this, then perhaps you have made a decision to begin to claw back your independence and free thought. Perhaps you will exit from social media, perhaps even the internet at large. But how do we help others to also make the exit? Everything is being transitioned to the online space. Our phones are starting to become indispensable to our infrastructure, as well as our social interactions. The people are online. They are not there spiritually in physical communities any more. How can we begin to transition away from bringing technology, and temptation, with us everywhere? How can we convince others to do the same?
In freeing ourselves, we also need to be careful to not create a war. Those individuals making the choice to target our dopamine structures are themselves at the behest of internal conflicting forces as well. Their dopamine also needs balance; needs direction. We must also remember that even an article is written in such a fashion to keep your attention through dopamine, and rhythm based structures,capturing not only your imagination, but also your physiological processes. This body-spirit axis works together as long as we are directing it in the right fashion.
Well, what is this direction? St. Mary’s Press has released a document of ethics in business which is illuminating, revolving around Catholic Social Teaching. In implementing business practice, we must keep at the forefront of our minds the wellbeing of the other. When we think on this, we can begin to see all of the irrelevant and detrimental industries we have around us. Spiritual growth of the individual and their communities should be paramount. People need to be given the opportunity to grow, and hopefully this will naturally lead to God, and also peace in their lives.
But this will take work at an individual level – we need to break the addiction. Then at a community level, we need to rebuild. Let’s remember and remind ourselves how to work effectively again, and reclaim our relax time.
As we begin to enter the new age of Artificial Intelligence, we can perhaps make a few observations:
Artificial Intelligence is incredibly useful
Artificial General Intelligence, where the AI can match or better any human output, is a long way off.
People may not need AGI to manipulate a populace.
I was reading an AI discussion on a prominent tech forum recently, and came across the following quote from Frank Herbert’s Dune:
“Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.”
Firstly, I was taken aback at how far ahead of its time that quote was. Secondly, I wanted to analyse why men turned their thinking over to machines in the first place.
Why are we using AI (which is a different question to why create AI)?
I think that what is happening here is something of a vicious cycle, whereby our brains are locked into a diminishing process.
Firstly, human beings, by and large, have an aversion to performing tasks that they do not want to do. Human history, then, has been full of inventions to automate the mundane. But it has also been full of inventions to automate the inefficient. Here’s where the lines start to blur, though. In the modern world, are we beginning to confuse the two?
It is mundane to repeat a thoughtless task when an automated solution is available, unless there is something in the outcome that you seek (eg. the gym). However, I believe a mistake in the current age is that, as consumers, we are grouping into the mundane some tasks that have outcomes that we should be seeking. For instance, I could spew out this blog post a lot faster if I used AI to prompt me on topics to use, style to write, well, lets just even say write the article itself. But in that, something human is lost. We lose authentic reflection on reality. Not only may we miss something that is useful to others, we also miss individual human progress in the contemplation of one’s own and others’ existence. I would say, the path to God. If we can’t reflect on our own existence, and that of others, then contemplation of the higher spiritual topics is also neglected, being replaced by rampant consumerism.
Writing a blog is just one example of a creative output that we are relegating to the mundane. There are surely many others.
But why are we doing this? Here’s where things begin to get tricky. It’s not just an aversion to work, but is also reflected in how we are grouping and organising data sources, as well as how we are forming/disbanding groups in the real, physical world.
Firstly, the data sources. Globalisation, spurred on by the internet, and particularly the centralisation within the internet (think social media) is resulting in a mass saturation of content. This results in competition for time, which leads to more and more sensationalist content as all the providers compete with each other. What is potentially happening physically is a rewiring of our brains, as it adapts to consuming what we can call bitty information. This consumption of bite-sized information over time also increases the perceived labour cost to reading a whole article. It also prevents us from finishing the whole article, since we are already seeking our next dopamine firing sensationalist headline. It also gives the illusion of knowledge, as we have all consumed a great many headlines by the end of our day, so much so, that we feel we can confidently categorise our fellow human beings into this camp or that camp, when really we are more or less all unknowledgeable idiots now. Furthermore, I would say this allows for some modern perspectives to form which haven’t undergone the rigour that perspectives might have had in the past, where people had more time to consider things, had more time and inclination to investigate and attain knowledge from their local environment to see if these claims were verified or useful. In fact, people’s local environments are becoming their screens, with the centralised information they consume completely abstracted from their local environment, whilst at the same time also forming it a few steps down the line. This is very dangerous, as it means that ideas can be implanted more easily, bringing us into an Orwellian state if malevolent actors decide to get involved. It is something similar to Newspeak, but instead of reducing the language in order to reduce expression, it is reducing the capacity of the brain to be able to think at depth, which in the end affects our ability to think critically and also express ourselves.
These global, centralised, social media outlets then, are not just rewiring our minds, but are also rewiring the local environments.
And so, going back to the original point, we don’t even need AGI to control a populace (to its detriment), we just need The New Newspeak, which rewires our brain into consuming bitty information, and normal AI, the tool which prompts the brain into classifying into mundane, those works that were previously seen as gratifying, both for the human populace, and for an individual’s personal development.
As a photographer who is trying to utilize physical media (working against the rise of AI, and the saturation of images on the internet due to globalisation), photographic prints are very important. But what I have found in the past is that framed pictures become boring very fast. Looking at the same picture everyday soon diminishes its value in the eye of the beholder, which is why I have become interested in the smaller print format, which I can chop and change frequently. With this in mind, I recently ordered and received some retro prints from MyPhotobook CH, as I was looking for something similar to the Polaroid look (mainly the format with white border). I expected something like a white bordered print with the square photo, and some writing underneath. What I actually received far surpassed my expectations.
Upon opening the prints, I was immediately greeted by a wonderful sheen to the photos. I next noticed the back to the photos, which with the black square and numbering, certainly looked like some form of instant film. Also, there are faint rivulets underneath the photo. Quite frankly, with the level of detail, I am wondering whether this is instant film. Either way, the price for something as elaborate as this is very, very good.
Next, on to the images themselves. They are certainly impactful to the eye, but I wonder if they are a little too saturated. I believe my monitor is calibrated, so for future prints I’ll have to desaturate my files ever so slightly, but this is really a minor quibble – the prints are great. I wonder whether the increased saturation is part of a process to replicate the Polaroid look, or, if they are instant film, then this is just a result of the formula on the photo paper.
I’ll certainly use this lab again if they are still offering the retro prints. That’s unless I buy myself a Polaroid Lab for personal printing.
Here are the prints in their easy-to-swap photo-holders.
Hello to all Neo-luddites and Tech Enthusiasts. I am here to bring you a new Community T-Shirt Project. Perhaps you feel like I shouldn’t be grouping you together, but it is a strange world we now find ourselves in. Grounded quite literally in the physical, but with the virtual world at our fingertips, what are we to make of reality and existence? Artificial Intelligence has almost (or perhaps already has) reached a point where we are unable to separate fact from fiction; reality and the imagination. We are presented with a dichotomy by those in both camps. For physical or virtual. But is this not missing the point? We have always travelled alongside technology throughout history. Big changes have come and gone, like industrialisation and manufacturing. How, then, are we to weather this massive change? We have global internet communication at our fingertips, and now the powers of virtual production are just a sentence away with AI. The ability to express ourselves has never been greater.
This, though, comes with a cost. Reality and truth are now at stake. Consumption of information through the internet comes with the peril of disinformation and manufactured reality. As our virtual worlds increase, and brain interface chips come to market, there is a real possibility that people will lose their grip on both physical reality, and also truth. The virtual world is morphing into one of imagination, whilst the physical world, and the people within it, remain our only route to the real.
Therefore, we must fashion a path with both virtual and physical either side of each other, balancing these seemingly competing worlds.
Yet already, the physical world, and people, are being neglected. We are holed up in our houses and apartments, glued to screens. When we venture outside, we are looking down into our phones, or taking selfies. We are forgetting how to interact with each other, make relationships, form physical groups, and have physical meetups. Our mental health is suffering, along with our physical health.
So what can we do about this?
There needs to be a rebalance in our lives between the physical and virtual. The virtual should be confined to the status of tool, rather than a mode of existence. Let’s begin to celebrate the physical.
I will soon release details of a Community T-Shirt Project that is just one way we can begin to reconnect with the physical, whilst communicating and interacting with others.
Stay tuned for more information, and join our mailing list below for more info.
As you may have gathered from previous posts, I am in the process of semi-rejecting The New Real of the Unreal. Artificial intelligence has arrived, and if we are not careful, then we stand to lose much, perhaps even our sanity.
For what is sanity apart from a firm connection to what is real? What is “real”, but surely that which is firmly believed to be the truth, firmly believed, that is, across the shared collective.
Of course, we can argue that our relationship with “truth” has always been fairly circumspect. Since the printing press, our “shared reality” has been a pushed reality that reflects the thoughts and observations (potentially) of a relatively small proportion of the population. Without adequate safeguards in place, if they are indeed possible, the idea of “truth” can be warped.
Which is why locality is so important. Can we really experience, or believe, truth without verification? If something is local, eg. a newspaper, then we can verify the stories with the environment to an extent. We can talk to people, we can visit localities.
And so what we find is that truth itself doesn’t travel long distances well. In fact, we are taught this from a young age through the game (rather inappropriately named) “Chinese Whispers”. Of course, not many consider the massive implications of this game, what this itself means about reality. And this is just in the physical realm. What are the implications for the digital realm? Concentrating a little more on the physical, we could be ignorant individuals, and focus our efforts entirely within a very local sphere, but the issue with this is that we live within an interconnected world, where events in far off places can affect our little localities. We need trade, we need security, we need to look after those who are less fortunate. With this in mind, there needs to be a trust handover to those who are in control. To those who control the information.
But can we indeed trust those in control of the information? For that, we need to analyse what is valuable to those in control. This is perhaps too broad a topic to consider in this post. We could say that each individual is valued for the unique person that they are, existing in a potentially infinite universe. Could say… Or we could be a little more pessimistic, and say that each individual is really a measure of economic potential. And this is where, in our current climate, things can start to get a little tricky. Because with AI, that economic potential is starting to look like it is a lot less than it was maybe 10 years ago.
But where does this all fit in with reality? This is the area I would like to explore a little more of over the next series of posts. I’ll start by saying that the digital world seems to be morphing into a product of imagination, rather than a reflection of the real, physical world. This is a problem, because people seem to have the idea that it is the latter, taking at face value what they read and see on the internet. With the advent of AI, there will soon be literally no way to discern fact from fiction online. The technological pace is frightening. The ability to manufacture “reality” is so profound, that we must also ask ourselves some very serious questions, such as, how long has this technology really been in existence?; how much of the internet has always been fabricated?; could a technological hegemony appear, or have already been in existence for a very long time?. We can see that there are multiple avenues for “reality” and our sanities to become frayed.
As an artist (although just a photographer), I am keen to begin to explore modern reality. What I like about photography, particularly film, is that at least I can be reasonably certain (bar some metaphysical internal discussions on whether matter really exists) that I have a snapshot of what is real, through the negative. But how, as an artist, can I begin to share this reality with others? How can we prove reality? Because I think that the future is going to bring with it a need for physicality. People are going to need to hold onto a physical item in their house whilst repeating, “This is real. This is real…”. How are we going to help people stay grounded, and encourage them to embrace physicality?
Launching Soon – Discover Wearable Art Like Never Before!
Introduction
Welcome to Kalimetric, where architecture meets fashion! We are thrilled to announce the upcoming launch of our exclusive architecture-inspired t-shirts, meticulously crafted by our resident artist. This unique collection blends the intricate beauty of architectural designs with the comfort and style of premium apparel, offering you wearable art that stands out in any crowd.
Why Architecture T-Shirts?
Architecture is not just about structures; it’s an art form that captures the essence of design, functionality, and aesthetics. Our architecture t-shirts are a tribute to this timeless art, transforming stunning architectural photographs and designs into fashionable, limited edition apparel. Whether you’re an architecture enthusiast, a design aficionado, or someone who appreciates unique fashion statements, our t-shirts are designed to resonate with your passion.
Meet Our Resident Artist
At the heart of our collection is Kalimetric, our talented resident artist. With a background in architectural and landscape photography, and also design, Kalimetric brings a unique perspective to each design, ensuring that every t-shirt is a masterpiece in its own right. Their dedication to capturing the finest details of architectural marvels translates into high-quality, visually stunning t-shirts that are both comfortable and stylish.
Unique Designs
Our architecture merchandise stands out for its exclusivity and attention to detail. Each t-shirt features:
High-Resolution Prints: Using state-of-the-art printing techniques, we ensure that every design retains its original detail and vibrancy.
Unique Design: Each shirt will come with a design element complete with text.
Quality and Craftsmanship
Quality is at the forefront of our brand. Our t-shirts are not only designed to impress but also to last. The soft, breathable fabric ensures that you stay comfortable all day long, whether you’re out exploring architectural landmarks or enjoying a casual day with friends.
Join Our Exclusive Waitlist
Don’t miss out on owning a piece of wearable art! By joining our waitlist, you’ll be the first to know about our launch, receive exclusive previews of our designs, and gain early access to purchase your favorite t-shirts before they sell out.
Follow Us on Social Media
Stay updated with the latest news, behind-the-scenes content, and exclusive offers by following us on social media:
At Kalimetric, we believe that fashion is an extension of your personality and passions. Our exclusive architecture t-shirts are designed to reflect the beauty and complexity of architectural art, offering you a unique way to express your love for design and aesthetics. Join our waitlist today and be among the first to experience this fusion of art and fashion.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.